MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Islet Transplant Experiment: Time for a Reassessment

2007· letter· en· W2054732986 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jonathan S. Bromberg, Bruce Kaplan, Philip F. Halloran, R. Paul Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAmerican Diabetes Association
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationIslet cell transplantationScopusIsletImmunosuppressionClinical trialRegimenPrednisoneType 1 diabetesDiabetes mellitusMEDLINEInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent data further defining the long term outcomes and complications associated with islet transplantation require a reassessment of the clinical trials. Also see article by Campbell et al in this issue on page 2311.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.317
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.315
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3170.315
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.007
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.029
Scholarly communication0.0240.057
Open science0.0090.012
Research integrity0.0260.078
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TransplantationSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207