Remarkably Strong T-Shaped Interactions between Aromatic Amino Acids and Adenine: Their Increase upon Nucleobase Methylation and a Comparison to Stacking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T-shaped geometries and interaction energies between select DNA nucleobases (adenine or 3-methyladenine) and all aromatic amino acids (histidine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, or tryptophan) were examined using BSSE-corrected MP2/6-31G*(0.25) potential energy surface scans, which determined the preferred nucleobase (face)-amino acid (edge) and nucleobase (edge)-amino acid (face) interactions. The energies of dimers with the strongest interactions were further studied at the CCSD(T)/CBS level of theory, which suggests that the T-shaped interactions in adenine dimers are very strong (up to -35 kJ mol(-1)). Nucleobase methylation to form a cationic damaged base (3-methyladenine) plays a large role in the relative monomer orientations and magnitude of the interactions, which increase by 17-125%. Most importantly, this study is the first to compare the stacking and T-shaped interactions between all aromatic amino acids and select (natural and damaged) DNA nucleobases where the differences between stacking and T-shaped interactions at the CCSD(T)/CBS level are small. Therefore, our results indicate that T-shaped interactions cannot be ignored when studying biological processes, and this manuscript discusses the importance of these interactions in the context of DNA repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".