Fracture‐Dominated Subsurface Flow and Transport in a Sloping Reclamation Cover
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The successful performance of reclamation soil covers over saline‐sodic overburden associated with oil sands mining in northern Alberta, Canada, depends on the dynamics of water and salt migration within these covers. Subsurface flow exerts a significant control on the distribution of soil moisture and salts within reclaimed landscapes. A conceptual model for fracture‐dominated lateral subsurface flow and transport in a sloping clay‐rich reclamation soil cover over saline‐sodic shale overburden was developed based on an interpretation of field observations. This model was then verified through the use of numerical simulations. The conceptual model assumes that lateral subsurface flow is dominated by a preferential flow system and that chemical equilibration between fresh snowmelt water stored in the macropores and higher concentration pore water stored in the soil matrix is nearly instantaneous. Numerical modeling of subsurface flow indicated that the discharge rate and cumulative volume are controlled by the bulk saturated hydraulic conductivity and drainable fracture porosity, respectively. A drainable fracture porosity ranging from 3 to 4% yielded a simulated cumulative discharge similar to measured values. A pseudo‐equivalent porous medium transport model was used to simulate the Na + concentration of collected subsurface flow with time. General agreement between measured and simulated values demonstrates that discharge concentrations increase as the depth of perched water diminishes with time and water drains through macropores associated with a matrix of higher solute concentrations lower in the cover profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".