MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054800273 · doi:10.1080/jom.2007.9710842

A 3-dimensional geological model of the Oak Ridges Moraine area, Ontario, Canada

2007· article· en· W2054800273 on OpenAlexaffabout
D R Sharpe, H A J Russell, C Logan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Maps · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersBaosteel-Australia Joint Research and Development CentreMinistry of Education, IndiaMinistry of Earth Sciences
KeywordsGeologyMoraineBedrockQuaternaryGeomorphologyGlacial periodDrumlinGeologic mapPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Please click here to download the map associated with this article. The Oak Ridges Moraine area, southern Ontario, includes most of the Greater Toronto Area, which is the most populated region of Canada. The ∼ 11,000 km2 region is bounded to the south by Lake Ontario and to the north where Paleozoic bedrock abuts Precambrian Canadian Shield. The area extends 160 km eastward from the Niagara Escarpment, a prominent 100 m high regional bedrock scarp. The surficial sediment is up to 200 m thick, and reveals exposures of the oldest Quaternary sediment in southern Canada. Population growth has caused land use conflicts and increased pressure on groundwater resources. Construction of a regional 3-D geological model of the glacial stratigraphy was needed to support a better understanding of aquifer distribution, scale, and resource potential and protection. Mapping of the regional glacial geomorphology and sediment succession identified a number of distinct landforms: tunnel channels, drumlins, eskers, moraines, and till and lacustrine plains. Using sequence stratigraphic concepts, strata have been grouped into four principal units that unconformably overlie Paleozoic bedrock: Lower sediment, Newmarket Till, Oak Ridges Moraine, and Halton Till. These four Quaternary units plus bedrock have been mapped in the subsurface as a succession of interpolated surfaces using an innovative stratigraphic database-GIS approach. The model-building process involved stratigraphically coding high-quality data, then integrating an extensive and diverse array of subsurface geological and archival datasets using an expert system (geological rules). Stratigraphic data subsets were then extracted and merged with DEM-controlled surface mapping and interpolated in a GIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MapsSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207