Absence of Tissue Ingrowth through the Textile Fabric in a Series of Explanted Clinic Stent-Grafts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the retrieved devices from one autopsy and five reoperations, the biocompatibility of explanted Talent stent-grafts was investigated to highlight the capacity of the fabric to act as an effective scaffold to regenerate a blood conduit. The autopsy device was encapsulated both internally and externally, but the capsules did not penetrate through the fabric structure. The reoperation devices showed discrete patches of compact fibrin and irregularly scattered mural thrombi. Positive staining of α-actin, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), urokinase (uPA), urokinase receptor (uPAR), and urokinase inhibitors (PAI 1, PAI 2, PAI 3, and protease nexin), and D-dimer was more frequently identified in the autopsy sample than in the reoperation samples. This preliminary assessment shows that the stent-graft retrieved during autopsy was better healed than those explanted at reoperation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".