EBV-associated perianal Hodgkin's disease in an HIV-positive individual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hodgkin's disease (HD) has a higher incidence in HIV-positive individuals. It tends to occur at extranodal sites, frequently exhibits an unfavorable histological type with large numbers of neoplastic cells, and almost invariably harbors Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). We describe a case of a 33-year-old HIV-positive man who presented with anal pain from a 4-cm mass in the anorectal canal. He had no B symptoms or peripheral lymphadenopathy. A chest X-ray was within normal limits. A biopsy showed an ulcerated mass composed of a mixed infiltrate of lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils, and Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells positive for CD15 and strongly positive for CD30. They were negative for CD45 and CD20. Numerous RS cells and lymphocytes were positive for EBV RNA using the EBER-1 probe. This highly unusual presentation of HD may reflect the greater incidence of anorectal lymphoma and of extranodal HD in the HIV-positive population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".