Syncretism and Idiosyncrasy: The Notion of Act in Thomas Traherne's Contemplative Practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The writings of the seventeenth-century priest and mystic, Thomas Traherne, provide readers with instructions on how best to mirror God's act-like nature. Traherne's formulation of God-as-act is expressed in both the Commentaries of Heaven and Centuries of Meditation, where his understanding of God draws upon both Neo-Platonic and Aristotelian understandings of ‘act,’ while reiterating Christian and biblical conceptions of an ever-creating deity. By drawing the Christian, scholastic, and Neo-Platonic traditions together, Traherne demonstrates his propensity for sycncretic eclecticism. His elaboration of how to attain to his unique notion of God-likeness is drawn from personal experience. Traherne relates his contemplative progress in the Centuries, where he describes for the reader's benefit the seven steps that led him to the beatific vision. The stepwise structure of Traherne's direction resembles the instructions of St. Ignatius and the Neo-Platonic Christian mystics to their exericants and novices. However, Traherne's method differs from St. Ignatius's Spiritual Exercises in its celebration of all creation over any particular object or person. Unlike the Neo-Platonists, Traherne's practice does not seek the ecstatic, but insists on the contemplative's lucidity throughout their spiritual progress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".