MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054886492 · doi:10.1002/iub.201

The HCV ARFP/F/core+1 protein: Production and functional analysis of an unconventional viral product

2009· review· en· W2054886492 on OpenAlex
Niki Vassilaki, Penelope Mavromara

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIUBMB Life · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHepatitis C virusVirologyOpen reading frameNS3CapsidViral proteinVirusHepacivirusGeneGeneticsPeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an enveloped positive-strand RNA virus of the Flaviviridae family. It has a genome of about 9,600 nucleotides encoding a large polyprotein (about 3,000 amino acids) that is processed by cellular and viral proteases into at least 10 structural and nonstructural viral proteins. A novel HCV protein has also been identified by our laboratory and others. This protein--known as ARFP (alternative reading frame protein), F (for frameshift) or core+1 (to indicate the position) protein--is synthesized by an open reading frame overlapping the core gene at nucleotide +1 (core+1 ORF). However, almost 10 years after its discovery, we still know little of the biological role of the ARFP/F/core+1 protein. Abolishing core+1 protein production has no affect on HCV replication in cell culture or uPA-SCID mice, suggesting that core+1 protein is probably not important for the HCV reproductive cycle. However, the detection of specific anti-core+1 antibodies and T-cell responses in HCV-infected patients, as reported by many independent laboratories, provides strong evidence that this protein is produced in vivo. Furthermore, analyses of the HCV sequences isolated from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and in vitro studies have provided strong preliminary evidence to suggest that core+1 protein plays a role in advanced liver disease and liver cancer. The available in vitro data also suggest that certain core function proteins may depend on production of the core+1 protein. We describe here the discovery of the various forms of the core+1 protein and what is currently known about the mechanisms of their production and their biochemical and functional properties. We also provide a detailed summary of the results of patient-based research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it