Density dependent population growth of the two‐spotted spider mite, <i>Tetranychus urticae</i> , on the host plant <i>Leonurus cardiaca</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We observed Tetranychus urticae (Koch), a polyphagous spider mite herbivore, on Leonurus cardiaca (L.) at several sites in eastern North America at variable density, ranging from extremely dense to sparse. To understand the nature of T. urticae 's population dynamics we experimentally manipulated population densities on L. cardiaca and assessed per capita growth after 1 to 2 generations in laboratory and field experiments. In particular, we took a ‘bottom‐up’ approach, manipulating both plant size and quality to examine effects on mite dynamics. Per capita growth was strongly dependent on the initial density of the mite population. Spider mite populations grew (1) in a negatively density dependent manner on small plants and (2) unhindered by density dependence on large plants. Mean per capita growth was 59% higher on small plants compared to large plants, irrespective of mite density. We also found evidence for density dependent induced susceptibility to spider mites in small plants and density dependent induced resistance in large plants. Hence, spider mite populations grew at a relatively fast rate on small plants, and this was associated with negative density dependence due to factors that depress population growth, such as food deterioration or limitation. On large plants, spider mite populations grew at a relatively slow rate, apparently resulting in herbivore densities that may not have been high enough to cause intraspecific competition or other forms of negative density dependence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".