Amiodarone and Concurrent Antiretroviral Therapy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Therapy for HIV often can make pharmacologic management of comorbidities challenging since many antiretroviral agents significantly modulate drug metabolism pathways. Amiodarone is commonly used to control cardiac arrhythmias; however, it is recognized as having a narrow therapeutic window with potential for significant drug toxicity. Amiodarone is metabolized by CYP3A4, CYP2C8 and CYP1A1 to an active metabolite and therefore may be affected by comedications that modulate these isoenzymes. Since amiodarone is frequently associated with toxicity, the Heart Rhythm Society (formerly the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology) developed guidelines to minimize the potential for adverse events. However, recommendations for the management of situations where amiodarone must be given with a drug that significantly affects its metabolism are lacking. This paper will discuss our experience with a case of concurrent amiodarone and antiretroviral therapy, as well as provide a review of interactions that may lead to toxicity or potential treatment failure with amiodarone. Primary literature was identified through Medline (1946 to May 2013) and Embase (1980 to May 2013), using the following terms: amiodarone, antiretroviral, HIV, cytochrome P450 and drug interaction. Case reports, studies of xenobiotic interactions with amiodarone in healthy volunteers, and in vitro studies that investigated metabolic pathways of amiodarone were reviewed. Although clinical data was limited, several cases support the finding that potent inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 may lead to amiodarone toxicity or lack of therapeutic effect, respectively. As well, several case reports, in vitro data and clinical investigations have associated some of the antiretrovirals with QT prolongation, which may result in additive cardiotoxicity in patients also receiving amiodarone. Therefore, to manage situations where amiodarone must be used with concurrent interacting antiretrovirals, we recommend a monitoring plan that follows the Heart Rhythm Society guidelines, however with the addition of serial therapeutic drug level monitoring and frequent electrocardiography to minimize potential toxicity and successfully manage both conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".