MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055001632 · doi:10.1159/000171404

Non-Surgical Approaches to Stones in the Biliary Tree

2008· review· en· W2055001632 on OpenAlexaff
J. J. Keating, Owen I. Corrigan, Alicia S. Chua, G Macdonald, N. Noonan, James G. McNulty, P. W. N. Keeling

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestive Diseases · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrsodeoxycholic acidGallBladder stonesExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyLithotripsyExtracorporealBiliary tractSurgeryBile ductGallstonesGeneral surgeryInternal medicineUrinary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical treatment of cholesterol gall stones aims to dissolve the stones leaving the biliary tract stone-free and the gall bladder in situ. The introduction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and contact solvent therapy with methyl tert butyl ether have revolutionised the medical management of both gall bladder stones and bile duct stones which are too large to be treated by sphincterotomy. Both approaches represent a major advance over cheno- and ursodeoxycholic acid which are effective in less than 30% of cases and require prolonged therapy. All medical treatments require a functioning gall bladder and suffer from relapse rates in the order of 10% per annum. Secondary prophylaxis is expensive and the rate of compliance and long term safety have yet to be established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigestive DiseasesSame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207