MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055002186 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a1940

Percutaneous Sclerotherapy for Facial Venous Malformations: Subjective Clinical and Objective MR Imaging Follow-Up Results

2009· article· en· W2055002186 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations and Hemangiomas
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsMedicineSclerotherapyPercutaneousVenous malformationRadiologyLesionMagnetic resonance imagingHemangiomaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Venous malformations are the most common of all vascular anomalies, 40% of which are found in the head and neck. We discuss results of percutaneous sclerotherapy using bleomycin for facial VMs by using subjective clinical assessment and objective changes on MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with facial VMs were treated by percutaneous sclerotherapy with bleomycin. Of these, 31 patients with 32 lesions had pre- and posttreatment MR imaging. Each lesion received between 1 and 9 sclerotherapy sessions (average, 3.5). MR findings and clinical results of treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical results were based on the physician's physical examination and interview of the patient; these were classified as worse, unchanged, or better. Objective results on MR imaging were classified as worse, no change, minor improvement (<50% decrease in size), marked improvement (>or=50% decrease), or cure. Objective and subjective results were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-one lesions showed objective improvement on MR imaging. Of these, 10 showed minor decrease in size and 11 showed marked decrease. Eleven lesions showed no change on MR imaging. No VMs were worse or completely cured. Subjectively, 29 patients and 30 clinicians thought that lesions improved. Four of 32 (12.5%) patients suffered minor transient complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous sclerotherapy by using bleomycin is a safe technique to objectively decrease size and subjectively alleviate symptoms of facial VMs. Subjective clinical improvement is not always associated with visual size reduction on MR imaging. Minimal size reduction or partial fibrosis of the lesion may be enough to achieve subjective clinical improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it