Phagocytosis of<i> Leishmania donovani</i> amastigotes is Rac1 dependent and occurs in the absence of NADPH oxidase activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Macrophages produce little superoxide during phagocytosis of Leishmania donovani amastigotes. In this study, we characterized molecular events associated with L. donovani amastigotes uptake by mouse macrophages, to further define the mechanisms by which they are internalized without triggering superoxide production. Using transient transfections, we first showed that internalization of L. donovani amastigotes is mediated by the GTPases Rac1 and Arf6, of which Rac1 is recruited and retained on parasite-containing phagosomes. Next, we showed that, whereas internalization of amastigotes induced no superoxide release, co-internalization of serum-opsonized zymozan and amastigotes resulted in superoxide production. Furthermore, in co-internalization experiments, we detected superoxide production in over 95% of phagosomes containing IgG-opsonized SRBC compared to 5% of amastigote-harboring phagosomes. These results suggest that amastigotes evade the ability of macrophages to produce superoxide during phagocytosis. Consistently, we observed that amastigotes induced barely detectable phosphorylation of the NADPH oxidase component p47phox, leading to a defective phagosomal recruitment of p67phox and p47phox. Finally, we showed that amastigotes disrupt phagosomal lipid raft integrity, potentially interfering with NADPH oxidase assembly. Collectively, our results indicate that internalization of L. donovani amastigotes is a Rac1- and Arf6-dependent process that occurs in the absence of significant NADPH oxidase activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".