MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Connexin45-Containing Neuronal Gap Junctions in Rodent Retina Also Contain Connexin36 in Both Apposing Hemiplaques, Forming Bihomotypic Gap Junctions, with Scaffolding Contributed by Zonula Occludens-1

2008· article· en· W2055030421 on OpenAlexafffund
Xinbo Li, Naomi Kamasawa, C. Ciolofan, Carl O. Olson, Shijun Lu, Kimberly G. V. Davidson, Thomas Yasumura, Ryuichi Shigemoto, John E. Rash, J.I. Nagy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeJapan Science and Technology AgencyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthHarvard University
KeywordsGap junctionConnexinElectrical SynapsesBiologyCell biologyIn vitroGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mammalian retinas contain abundant neuronal gap junctions, particularly in the inner plexiform layer (IPL), where the two principal neuronal connexin proteins are Cx36 and Cx45. Currently undetermined are coupling relationships between these connexins and whether both are expressed together or separately in a neuronal subtype-specific manner. Although Cx45-expressing neurons strongly couple with Cx36-expressing neurons, possibly via heterotypic gap junctions, Cx45 and Cx36 failed to form functional heterotypic channels in vitro. We now show that Cx36 and Cx45 coexpressed in HeLa cells were colocalized in immunofluorescent puncta between contacting cells, demonstrating targeting/scaffolding competence for both connexins in vitro. However, Cx36 and Cx45 expressed separately did not form immunofluorescent puncta containing both connexins, supporting lack of heterotypic coupling competence. In IPL, 87% of Cx45-immunofluorescent puncta were colocalized with Cx36, supporting either widespread heterotypic coupling or bihomotypic coupling. Ultrastructurally, Cx45 was detected in 9% of IPL gap junction hemiplaques, 90-100% of which also contained Cx36, demonstrating connexin coexpression and cotargeting in virtually all IPL neurons that express Cx45. Moreover, double replicas revealed both connexins in separate domains mirrored on both sides of matched hemiplaques. With previous evidence that Cx36 interacts with PDZ1 domain of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), we show that Cx45 interacts with PDZ2 domain of ZO-1, and that Cx36, Cx45, and ZO-1 coimmunoprecipitate, suggesting that ZO-1 provides for coscaffolding of Cx45 with Cx36. These data document that in Cx45-expressing neurons of IPL, Cx45 is almost always accompanied by Cx36, forming "bihomotypic" gap junctions, with Cx45 structurally coupling to Cx45 and Cx36 coupling to Cx36.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207