MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055046213 · doi:10.1353/fch.2011.0003

The French-Amerindian Religious Encounter in Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth-Century New France

2002· article· fr· W2055046213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel A. Scalberg

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Colonial History · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyAncient historyArchaeologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1725, après quarante ans de service à Québec, l'Iveque Jean-Baptiste Saint-Vallier se décourageait de l'état spirituel de la population de la Nouvelle France. Il ne s'agissait pas seulement de la difficulté à convertir les indigènes au christianisme, mais aussi de l'indifférence, même du mépris, des français en ce qui concernait les pratiques de la religion catholique. Beaucoup de jeunes gens français s'échappaient entièrement aux centres peuplés de Français pour s'engager comme coureurs de bois au commerce de peaux de castor gras au pays d'en haut. Ils se mariaient avec des jeunes filles indigènes, ce qui facilitait les relations commerciales avec les Amérindiens. Intégrés dans les communautés indigènes, les coureurs de bois adoptaient beaucoup de leurs pratiques sociales, culturelles, et religieuses. Le destin du catholicisme n'était guère meilleur parmi les habitants d'origine française demeurants dans les villes ou dans d'autres centres de population. Des documents des Archives coloniales françaises et des Archives du séminaire de Québec, aussi bien que des Archives de l'Archidiocèse de Québec, parmi d'autres sources, sortent des exemples des difficultés qu'avaient l'Iveque Saint-Vallier et d'autres prêtres à diriger la vie religieuse catholique dans une colonie où les français rencontraient les indigènes avec une autre vie spirituelle à eux déjà bien établie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench Colonial HistorySame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207