Superconducting condensation energy in a diluted Kondo lattice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heavy fermion compounds are host to many interesting but poorly understood strong correlation effects, leading in exceptional cases to unconventional superconductivity. CeCoIn 5 is such an example of an ambient pressure heavy fermion superconductor with a T c of 2.3K. Such compounds are best described as a Kondo lattice, where Ce, Yb or U ions form a periodic lattice of magnetic moments coupled to the conduction electrons via antiferromagnetic exchange interaction. Dilution, or substitution, of the Kondo ion with a lanthanide, actinide or alkali-earth element that does not participate in the Kondo lattice, results in the so-called "Kondo hole". The electron scattering off the Kondo hole leads to significant changes in both the normal and superconducting properties. We have investigated the suppression of superconductivity in CeCoIn 5 diluted with La, Yb, Y, Ca, Th, Gd, Er, Eu and Lu via specific heat measurements on well characterized single crystals. The suppression of the superconducting condensation energy exhibits a remarkable departure from the Abrikosov-Gorkov impurity pair breaking picture, emphasizing that the Kondo holes are no ordinary pair-breakers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".