MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055073472 · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7290

Effects of pasture versus confinement and marine oil supplementation on the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism in mammary, liver, and adipose tissues of lactating dairy cows

2014· article· en· W2055073472 on OpenAlexafffund
Payam Vahmani, Kathleen Glover, A. H. Fredeen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of AgricultureDalhousie University
FundersDairy Farmers of Nova Scotia
KeywordsLipogenesisAdipose tissueFish oilLactationAnimal scienceBiologyLactoseIce calvingFADS2Lipid metabolismDairy cattleEndocrinologyInternal medicinePeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaFood sciencePolyunsaturated fatty acidFatty acidPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptorGeneBiochemistryPregnancyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research was conducted to evaluate the effects of management system (MS), marine lipid supplementation (LS), and their interaction on the relative mRNA abundance of 11 genes involved in lipid synthesis in mammary, liver, and subcutaneous adipose tissues in lactating dairy cows. These genes included those involved in FA uptake (LPL), de novo FA synthesis (ACACA, FASN), FA desaturation (SCD1, FADS1, FADS2), and transcriptional regulation of lipogenesis (SREBF1, SCAP, INSIG1, THRSP, and PPARG). Forty-eight peripartal Holstein cows were blocked by parity and predicted calving date and assigned to either a pasture (n=23) or confinement (n=25) system. Within each system, cows were allocated randomly (7-9 cows per treatment) to a control (no oil supplement) or 1 of 2 isolipidic (200 g/d) supplements, fish oil (FO) or microalgae (MA), for 125 ± 5 d starting 30 d precalving. The experiment was conducted as a split-plot design, with MS being the whole plot treatment and LS as the subplot treatment. At 100 ± 2 DIM, 4 cows from each treatment combination (24 cows in total) were euthanized and tissue samples were collected for gene expression analysis. No interactions between MS and LS were observed regarding any of the variables measured in this study. Milk production (34.0 vs. 40.1 kg/d), milk fat (1.10 vs. 1.41 kg/d), protein (0.95 vs. 1.22 kg/d), and lactose (1.56 vs. 1.86 kg/d) were lower for pasture compared with confinement. The effect of LS on milk production and milk composition (yields and contents) was significant only for milk fat content that was reduced with MA compared with FO (3.00 vs. 3.40%) and the control (3.56%). The mammary mRNA abundance of PPARG (-32%) and FASN (-29%) was lower in grazing compared with confined cows, which was accompanied by reduced (-43%) secretion of de novo synthesized fatty acids in milk. Grazing was associated with reduced expression of ACACA (-48%), FASN (-48%), and THRSP (-53%) in subcutaneous adipose tissues, which was consistent with the lower body condition score (i.e., lower net adipose tissue deposition) in grazing compared with confined cows. Feeding either FO or MA downregulated hepatic expression of FASN, SCD1, FADS2, and THRSP. The reduced secretion of de novo synthesized fatty acids in milk of grazing cows compared with confined cows might be related in part to the downregulation of genes involved in lipid synthesis, and that LS have tissue-specific effects on expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism, with liver being the most responsive tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207