MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055073681 · doi:10.4043/16207-ms

Design Standard for Concrete LNG Terminals Offshore

2004· article· en· W2055073681 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Knut Waagaard

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineOffshore constructionEngineeringMarine engineeringCivil engineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Investors and oil companies have lately shown an interest in concept development, design and construction of reinforced concrete structures in the marine environment. Examples of such concepts are fixed and floating concrete platform to be used as terminals for LNG/LPG. Based on this interest, DNV has developed an Offshore Standard for Classification of Concrete LNG Terminal. The DNV Offshore standard for " Offshore Concrete Structures " is based on the earlier Rules for Design of Concrete in the marine environment, i.e. the 1974 Rules, the 1977 Rules and the 1993 FOI Rules. The Offshore standard is further founded on the experience gained with the used of these standards and the durability of existing platforms built in the period after the installation of the first concrete platform at Ekofisk in 1973. The LNG containment is incorporating the requirements of IGC and EN1473 into the general design approach for offshore concrete structures. The DNV Offshore standard for offshore concrete structures can be used for material selection, design, construction supervision and in-service inspection of Offshore Concrete Structures of any type and with the new DNV-OSC503 Offshore LNG/LPG terminals in concrete is also covered by a DNV Offshore Standard. The focus in this paper is directed toward LNG terminal due to the current need for a concrete standard associated with new terminal concepts. DNV Offshore Standard C502 " Offshore Concrete Structures" and DNV OS-C503 " Offshore Concrete LNG Terminals" will be issued in spring 2004 and can be applied for design, verification and classification of offshore Concrete Structures where DNV is acting as classification company or DNV is performing verification work for compliance with specific standard. The standard is considered to be of significant assistance to both the owner, the designer and the National Authorities (US Coast Guard) in quality assurance of the New Terminal Structures, as currently no comprehensive standard exist covering the design of these new innovative structures in concrete. Introduction AkerKvarner's website annonced on October 31 2003 "AkerKvarner has been awarded a contract to perform engineering, procurement and construction management (EPCm) services for concrete structures placed on the seabed for ChevronTexaco's proposed Port Pelican and Baja California offshore terminals in North America." The proposed terminals will be placed on concrete substructures on the seabed many miles off the coast. Similar large concrete structures have been designed, built and installed by North Sea Contractors for offshore oil and gas production platforms since early nineteen seventies, most of which in hash weather regions in the North Sea and North Atlantic. These two LNG terminals for gas import may be the first import terminals to be built offshore in concrete. Interests in the concept, however, indicate that this may be the first out of a series of this type of LNG offshore terminals. From literature it is speculations that only in North America 10-12 LNG terminals are planned either in Canada, US or in Mexico. It is expected that at least seven of these terminals will be contracted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207