MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055076206 · doi:10.1159/000116441

Semi-Late Onset and Rapidly Progressive Case of Lafora’s Disease with Predominant Cognitive Symptoms

2008· article· en· W2055076206 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Genton, Michel Borg, Piernanda Vigliano, Jean‐François Pellissier, Joseph Roger

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Neurology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyoclonusLafora diseaseProgressive myoclonus epilepsyMedicineElectroencephalographyPediatricsCentral nervous system diseaseBrain biopsyDiseasePsychologyAnesthesiaPathologySurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors report a sporadic case of Lafora's disease, unusual for the comparatively late age at onset and atypical evolution. Discrete visual phenomena that may be considered as partial seizures occurred at age 19 years. A generalized tonic-clonic seizure occurred at 20 years of age and myoclonus became apparent a few weeks later. A massive cognitive dysfunction was clearly apparent 3 months after the first seizure and further mental deterioration occurred although seizures were controlled by medication and myoclonus remained minimal. The EEG showed the typical association of generalized and focal (occipital) changes. Axillary++ skin and muscle biopsies were positive and easily confirmed the diagnosis. The clinical presentation of Lafora's disease is considered by the authors to be sufficient for a clinical diagnosis, even in such an atypical case. Confirmation by skin biopsy is easily obtainable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean NeurologySame topicGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusFrench-language works237,207