MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055168136 · doi:10.1176/pn.39.6.0020a

French Psychiatrist Promotes Fatty Acids For Depression Care

2004· article· en· W2055168136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Arehart-Treichel

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)NothingAnxietyPsychiatryPsychologyMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article International NewsFull AccessFrench Psychiatrist Promotes Fatty Acids For Depression CareJoan Arehart-TreichelJoan Arehart-TreichelPublished Online:19 Mar 2004https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.39.6.0020aSome scientific evidence suggests that omega-three fatty acids can counter depression and perhaps bipolar disorder (Psychiatric News, August 3, 2001; January 16). But in France, interest in the omega-three fatty acids is extending far beyond the scientific lab.French psychiatrist David Servan-Schreiber, M.D., has written a best-selling book called Guérir—le stress, l'anxiété, et la dépression sans médicaments ni psychanalyse ( To Heal—Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Without Medication and Without Psychoanalysis).In this book, he touts the omega-three fatty acids as a natural treatment for depression. So far, the book has sold some 380,000 copies and has prompted a number of French people to buy omega-three fatty acids, according to a February 18 French television report.Servan-Schreiber is quoted as saying on a University of Laval, Quebec, Web site: "Antidepressants are a great discovery, and they are very useful in certain cases. My book is against nothing. It is for research into efficacious natural methods and for their integration into the practice of medicine." ▪ ISSUES New Archived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyFrench-language works237,207