Bibliographic record
Abstract
Migrations littéraires : Maryse Condé et Emily Brontë — En tant que ré-écriture de Wuthering Heights (1847) d'Emily Brontë, La Migration des coeurs (1995) de Maryse Condé transpose le classique anglais dans un contexte antillais marqué par la violence colonialiste et l'hétérogénéité. Ce procédé de ré-écriture est un procédé de traduction dans le sens large du terme parce que l'improvisation à laquelle se livre Condé maintient un lien métonymique avec l'original tout en fonctionnant de façon indépendante. À son tour, la traduction anglaise du roman de Condé, Windward Heights (1998), suit ces pistes brouillées mais, par manque de stratégies conséquentes de traduction, compromet l'élan créateur de Condé en rapprochant son texte trop près de celui de Brontë. Cette étude montrera que ces mouvements de migration littéraire impliquent que l'écriture s'appuie sur des procédés de traduction et que la ré-écriture maintient une difficile relation métonymique avec l'original en lui rendant hommage tout en le transformant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".