MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055172584 · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/21/7/075035

Nonlinear free vibration analysis of sandwich shell structures with a constrained electrorheological fluid layer

2012· article· en· W2055172584 on OpenAlexaff
Farough Mohammadi, Ramin Sedaghati

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemShell (structure)VibrationElectrorheological fluidFinite element methodBoundary value problemNotationMaterials scienceStructural engineeringMathematical analysisMathematicsElectric fieldPhysicsEngineeringAcousticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear vibration analysis of sandwich shell structures with a constrained electrorheological (ER) fluid is investigated for different boundary conditions. To accomplish this, a nonlinear finite element model of a multi-layer shell structure with an ER fluid layer in the core of the sandwich shell has been developed. A new notation referred to as H-notation is presented, in place of the two well known notations referred to as B- and N-notation, in order to represent the nonlinear equations of motion. This notation leads to a considerable reduction in the computational costs caused by the time-consuming integrations in the nonlinear vibration analysis of the structure using a direct iteration technique. In particular, this notation is very useful for solving the nonlinear vibration analysis of sandwich layered shell structures in which large numbers of integrations are required to be repeatedly performed throughout the direct iteration technique. Finally, for different boundary conditions, the effects of small and large displacements, core thickness ratio and electric field intensity on the nonlinear vibration damping behavior of the sandwich shell structure are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart Materials and StructuresSame topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207