Hip pain in 234 non-ambulatory adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional multicentre study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In orthopaedic clinical practice hip pain is the main complaint of adults with cerebral palsy (CP). The aim of this descriptive study was to specify prevalence of hip pain and to propose methods of care other than surgery. The study was a cross sectional multicentre one based in the Rhĵne-Alpes region. Patients over 15 years of age, with CP who were non-ambulatory were included. Two hundred and thirty-four patients were questioned. Mean age of the patients was 27 years 10 months, median 26 years 1 month, with 59.3% males and 40.7% females. Patients were questioned about pain with precise information about the circumstances of pain, tolerance, and treatment. Pain was judged to be intolerable if it prevented usual activities. Prevalence of hip pain was 47.2%. Pain was judged to be tolerable in 35.6% of the 234 patients, i.e. in 75.5% of patients with hip pain. There were three types of pain: provoked pain, pain linked to position, and spontaneous pain. Medical treatment was given to only 13.6% of patients with hip pain. The first treatment for hip pain is to avoid circumstances where pain occurs; medical treatment is reserved for when daily life cannot be adapted sufficiently to prevent pain. Medical treatment must be appropriate with doses of adequate strength before proposing surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".