BID-D59A Is a Potent Inducer of Apoptosis in Primary Embryonic Fibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proapoptotic activity of BID seems to solely depend upon its cleavage to truncated tBID. Here we demonstrate that expression of a caspase-8 non-cleavable (nc) BID-D59A mutant or expression of wild type (wt) BID induces apoptosis in Bid -/-, caspase-8 -/-, and wt primary MEFs. Western blot analysis indicated that no cleavage products appeared in cells expressing ncBID. ncBID was as effective as wtBID in inducing cytochrome c release, caspase activation, and apoptosis. ncBID and wtBID (nc/wtBID) were much less effective than tBID in localizing to mitochondria and in inducing cytochrome c release, but only slightly less effective in inducing apoptosis. Studies with Apaf-1- and caspase-9-deficient primary MEFs indicated that both proteins were essential for nc/wtBID and for tBID-induced apoptosis. Most importantly, expression of non-apoptotic levels of either ncBID or wtBID in Bid -/- MEFs induced a similar and significant enhancement in apoptosis in response to a variety of death signals, which was accompanied by enhanced localization of BID to mitochondria and cytochrome c release. Thus, these results implicate full-length BID as an active player in the mitochondria during apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".