Effectiveness of WBC reduction in neonates: what is the evidence of benefit?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presence of WBCs in RBCs is thought to be associated with a number of significant adverse effects in recipients. In adults, WBC reduction has been shown to reduce the frequency of HLA alloimmunization, CMV and HTLV infections, and febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions. However, neonates are unique, given that they have an immature immune system and are frequently transfused with RBCs. Thus, the aims of this systematic review were to determine whether WBC reduction of RBCs transfused to neonates decreases the transmission of CMV, reduces the ability to develop HLA antibodies, or reduces the risk of immunomodulation. In addition, nosocomial infection, mortality, and duration of stay were identified and analyzed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All studies of WBC reduction were identified by a systematic review of the literature. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were grouped based on study outcome. Where appropriate, studies were pooled to obtain an overall measure of effect. RESULTS: Nine eligible studies were identified from the systematic literature search, and six were deemed evaluable. Two studies evaluated WBC reduction and the development of CMV, with different results. The pooled OR was 0.19 (95% Cl, 0.01-3.41), suggesting a clinical but nonsignificant effect. Two studies evaluated WBC reduction and HLA antibody development. As with CMV, the two studies were not congruent in their results. The pooled OR was 0.17 (95% Cl, 0.01-2.43). As for immunomodulation, two small studies presented evidence of a statistically significant change in lymphocyte subsets. No studies were identified with a primary objective of evaluating the impact of WBC reduction on nosocomial infection, mortality, or duration of stay. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that WBC reduction may be effective in neonates; however, further studies are needed. The lack of convincing data and the significant cost of WBC reduction mandate evaluations to determine the clinical and economic impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.108 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".