MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055343774 · doi:10.1136/ebmh.3.1.31

Typical clinical doses of methylphenidate did not cause tics or exacerbate pre-existing tics in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

2000· article· en· W2055343774 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mark Sanford

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Mental Health · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethylphenidateTicsAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderPediatricsMedicinePlaceboAttention deficit disorderPsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Law SF, Schachar RJ. Do typical clinical doses of methylphenidate cause tics in children treated for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry1999 Aug; 38 : 944 –51. [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: In children treated for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), do typical clinical doses of methylphenidate (MPH) cause tics or exacerbate pre-existing mild to moderate tics? Non-randomised, blinded (patients and outcome assessors)*, placebo controlled trial with 1 year of follow up. Children were originally randomised to the intervention groups but crossovers were maintained and analysed in the group they crossed over to. The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 91 children (mean age 8 y, 81% boys) with ADHD with and without comorbid tics who had no previous medication for ADHD or tics. Children had to have a history of ADHD symptoms for ≥6 months beginning before … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJournal%2Bof%2Bthe%2BAmerican%2BAcademy%2Bof%2BChild%2Band%2BAdolescent%2BPsychiatry%26rft.stitle%253DJ%2BAm%2BAcad%2BChild%2BAdolesc%2BPsychiatry%26rft.aulast%253DLaw%26rft.auinit1%253DS.%2BF.%26rft.volume%253D38%26rft.issue%253D8%26rft.spage%253D944%26rft.epage%253D951%26rft.atitle%253DDo%2Btypical%2Bclinical%2Bdoses%2Bof%2Bmethylphenidate%2Bcause%2Btics%2Bin%2Bchildren%2Btreated%2Bfor%2Battention-deficit%2Bhyperactivity%2Bdisorder%253F%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1097%252F00004583-199908000-00009%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F10434485%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00004583-199908000-00009&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10434485&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F3%2F1%2F31.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000081664700009&link_type=ISI

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based Mental HealthSame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207