MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055445566 · doi:10.1021/ma060411l

High-Temperature Free Radical Copolymerization of Styrene and Butyl Methacrylate with Depropagation and Penultimate Kinetic Effects

2006· article· en· W2055445566 on OpenAlexaff
Deheng Li, Ning Li, Robin A. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotopolymerization techniques and applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerPolymer chemistryMonomerMethacrylateStyreneChemistryReactivity (psychology)PolymerizationSolventKineticsMethyl methacrylatePolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copolymers of methacrylate and styrene, the main components of many solvent-based automotive coating formulations, are produced under higher temperature starved-feed conditions in order to reduce the solvent level while controlling polymer composition. Under these conditions methacrylate depropagation has a significant impact on polymer molecular weights and free monomer concentrations in the reactor. Meanwhile, a strong penultimate effect has been observed for this binary system at lower temperatures, also affecting the polymerization rate. In this work, the combined effect of depropagation and penultimate copolymerization kinetics is investigated. The copolymer-averaged propagation rate coefficient for butyl methacrylate and styrene is determined as a function of monomer composition using pulsed-laser polymerization over a range of temperatures. A clear penultimate effect is seen even at the elevated temperatures at which depropagation is important. Radical and monomer reactivity ratios show a negligible temperature dependency between 50 and 150 °C. The Lowry case 1 representation adequately describes the effect of methacrylate depropagation over the range of conditions examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicPhotopolymerization techniques and applicationsFrench-language works237,207