MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055475356 · doi:10.1115/pvp2003-2074

Improved Flow-Induced Vibration and Work-Rate Measurements of Steam-Generator Tubes

2003· article· en· W2055475356 on OpenAlexaff
Victor P. Janzen, Bruce Smith, Luc Brunet, Saman Fernando, D. Fingas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrettingVibrationBundleBoiler (water heating)Tube (container)Materials scienceVolumetric flow rateWork (physics)Vortex-induced vibrationMechanical engineeringFlow (mathematics)Structural engineeringNuclear engineeringEngineeringMechanicsAcousticsComposite materialPhysicsWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past, the excessive fretting-wear of U-bend tubes observed in some nuclear steam generators has led to increased tube inspections, unexpectedly high numbers of plugged tubes and the prospect of degraded performance if left unchecked. In this paper, recent vibration and work-rate experiments that have attempted to address this problem are summarized, including tests of two-span U-tubes in air-water and straight tubes in two-phase Freon. Tube bundles were subjected to two-phase cross-flow over a wide range of flow conditions, measuring tube vibration, flow characteristics in the bundle, and the dynamic interaction (work-rate) between tubes and supports that gives rise to fretting-wear. Developments in vibration and work-rate instrumentation and software analysis tools are also presented. The result is an improved ability to measure dynamic properties and, thus, to better predict the vibration response and fretting-wear performance of steam generators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207