Inactive C8A-humanin analog is as stable as a potent S14G-humanin analog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously shown that the structural stability of humanin (HN), a neuroprotective peptide ligand, is one of the attributes to the observed activity differences between HN analogs. It has been observed that the activity increased consecutively in the S7A‑HN analog, the parent HN and the S14G‑HN analog, consistent with the increased stability observed in that order. In the present study, the structure and stability of another inactive analog, C8A‑HN, was measured, which has been revealed to have no neuroprotective activity similar to that of the S7A‑HN analog and hence may have compromised stability. While all these analogs of HN demonstrated a similar disordered secondary structure in phosphate-buffered saline at 5˚C, as determined by circular dichroism spectroscopy, they revealed different structures at 37˚C. At 37˚C, less active HN and inactive S7A‑HN revealed a structure with a valley at ~217 nm, indicating a conversion from the disordered structure to a β‑sheet. Such a conversion was largely irreversible. By contrast, C8A‑HN and S14G‑HN demonstrated a similar structure at 37˚C and at 5˚C and remained largely disordered. The observed small structural changes of the C8A‑HN analog at 37˚C and its reversibility upon cooling do not support a hypothesis that the instability at 37˚C may have caused the reduced activity of this analog. Therefore an alternative explanation for its activity loss is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".