MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055597837 · doi:10.1353/cal.2011.0077

Afro-Peruvians and the Official Cultural Institutionalism: Recovering the Lost Voices

2011· article· en· W2055597837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mbaré Ngom, Chelsea Choppy, Emily A. Bernstein, Dain Scheibel

Bibliographic record

VenueCallaloo · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriticismFolkloristicsSociologyAnthropologyDancePoetryInstitutionalismHistoryArt historyArtLiteraturePoliticsFolklorePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Afro-Peruvians and the Official Cultural Institutionalism:Recovering the Lost Voices M'bare N'gom Peruvian negritude literature, to use the apt expression of the illustrious critic and scholar Estuardo Núñez, is a cultural project that has received very little critical and theoretical attention from scholars, neither in Peru nor abroad. Until very recently, the majority of sporadic studies about Peruvian writers of African descent and their cultural creation were limited to very few authors such as Nicomedes Santa Cruz, Enrique López Albújar, Gregorio Martínez, and Antonio Gálvez Ronceros; out of all of them, Nicomedes Santa Cruz is the most well known and studied decimista, folklorist, and poet. This special issue of Callaloo intends to divulge the trans-African experience in the cultural creation of the Afro-descendents in Peru.1 Likewise, it has attempted to show the place where these outlying and alternative cultural projects lie, within what the Peruvian critic Dorian Espezua Salmón calls "literary institutionalism" or the literary canon, that is, a place of cultural validation but also of exclusion. As for us—because of the "profound heterogeneity" that characterizes Peruvian society at all levels—we will be defining this space as "official cultural institutionalism" by using the conceptual category and the criticism proposed by Antonio Cornejo Polar as well as by using the cultural products that are the subject of the studies that comprise this book.2 Indeed, although the majority of works here deal with literature, others contemplate expressive platforms such as painting, music, dance, decimas, popular folk songs, and theater. Martha Ojeda observes that the incorporation into the literary canon, and we add cultural canon, of cultural works historically situated outside of the canon itself is due to the fact that "the new literary theories and critical focuses, such as cultural studies, are giving more importance to non-canonical authors and artistic manifestations ignored by the traditional literary critic" (1). Indeed, it was in American and, to a lesser extent, Canadian university centers where these critical traditions about the literary creations of Hispanic-American authors of African descent were recognized at the end of the 1970s.3 It is within this opening—one of cultural fluidity and inclusion—that we should place the distinct institutional and academic initiatives better known as "Recovery Projects." These began to appear in the United States in the 1990s, and their objective was, among others, to spread knowledge about the cultural presence of groups that were traditionally invisible in North American culture such as African Americans, women, and Hispanics in general, as well as their contribution to the literary history and, consequently, cultural history of the United States and of the Americas in general. While these efforts are praiseworthy, [End Page 286] some official critics warn us against attempting to establish what they call "other canons," since we would run the risk of fragmenting the official canon and, therefore, devaluing it. As for us, we believe that these initiatives will neither fragment nor devalue the canon, but rather contribute towards democratizing and enriching it while bringing to light the work of authors who have been confined to the margins on both a cultural and historical spectrum, much like the case of women, Native Americans, blacks, and other social and cultural players. Besides, inclusion serves to promote the recovery of these lost voices (Schweitzer 198). The same thing occurs with the discourse on those called ethnic minorities in official languages (Spanish) and/or in national languages (Quechua, Aymara, Guaraní, etc.) that have traditionally been excluded from the official cultural institutionalism. Just recently, in some countries a few voices have started to incorporate themselves into the national cultural system and, consequently, in the literary system. Peru is no exception. The Afro-descendant contribution to the official Peruvian national culture is conspicuous by its absence, though this is not the case in the field of popular culture. Since the 1950s, thanks to the efforts of the Santa Cruz Gamarra family, the singer Susana Baca, the diverse platforms of artistic expression, and artistic groups such as Milenio and Peru Negro, there has been a certain kind of recognition in some institutional venues.4 Nevertheless, literature doesn't...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.017
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCallalooSame topicLatin American Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207