Oxazoles revisited: On the nature of binding of benzoxazole and 2-methylbenzoxazole with the zinc and palladium halides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A synthetic and structural (X-ray) investigation into the bonding modes of benzoxazole (box) and 2-methylbenzoxazole (Mebox) ligands with halide precursors of Zn and Pd has been undertaken to clarify earlier discrepancies concerning the nature of the bonding mode(s) of the two azoles. In four structurally characterised examples, all contain the title ligands in a κ(1)N bonding motif. Calculations at the density functional level (DFT) of theory (B3LYP) confirm the ground state stability of this class of coordination for several hypothetical Pd and Zn (gas phase) compounds. The attempt to obtain suitable crystalline material of PdCl(2)(box)(2) (i.e., 5) leads to substantial complex degradation. One minor product of this process has been identified (X-ray) as the diarylformamidinato complex C(26)H(22)N(4)O(4)Pd, presumably formed via a complex combination of the decomposition products of both free box and 5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".