MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2055684960 · doi:10.1118/1.4815366

TU‐C‐108‐02: Novel Full 3D Water‐Equivalent Dosimetry Technique Using a Single Light‐Field Camera for Photons, Electrons and Ion‐Beams Dosimetry

2013· article· en· W2055684960 on OpenAlexaff
M Goulet, L Gingras, Sam Beddar, Luc Beaulieu, Louis Archambault

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de QuébecCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorDosimetryPhysicsOpticsScintillationDosimeterLight fieldPhotonRadiationNuclear medicineDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Using an array of micro‐lenses coupled with its active sensor, a light‐field camera samples the incoming optical photons in both the spatial and angular domain. This work presents the proof‐of‐concept and experimental validation of a 3D dosimeter based on the reconstruction of the light pattern emitted from a plastic scintillator volume and recorded using a light‐field camera. Using a single, fixed camera device, this technology enables real‐time, multi‐plane experimental measurement of static and dynamic radiotherapy delivery. Method: A Raytrix R5 light‐field camera was used to image a 10×10×10cm3 EJ‐260 plastic scintillator immersed in a water tank and irradiated with both square field and small MLC segments on a Clinac iX linear accelerator. The 3D light distribution emitted by the scintillator volume was reconstructed at a 5mm resolution in all dimensions by backprojecting the light collected by each pixel of the light‐field camera using a total variation minimization iterative reconstruction algorithm. Results: Signal contamination by Cerenkov emission was evaluated to less than 0.5% of the collected scintillation light for all field investigated, and as such Cerenkov light filtration was deemed unnecessary. Light‐field acquisition rate of at least 1 frame per second was achieved by the camera at a 600MU/min dose rate. The absolute dose difference between the reconstructed 3D dose and the expected dose calculated using the treatment planning software Pinnacle3 was on average below 3% for square fields and 5% for MLC segments in the high dose, low gradient region of each acquired field. Conclusions: Millimeter resolution dosimetry over an entire 3D volume is achievable in real‐time using a single light‐field camera. Because no moving parts are required in the dosimeter, the incident dose distribution can be acquired as a function of time, thus enabling the validation of static and dynamic radiation delivery with photons, electrons and ions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→