Cellular Phosphorylation of an Acidic Proline-Rich Protein, PRP1, a Secreted Salivary Phosphoprotein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phosphorylation of many secreted salivary proteins is necessary for their biological functions. Identification of the kinase, which is responsible for in vivo phosphorylation, is complicated, because several of the protein phosphorylation sites conform both to the recognition sequence of casein kinase 2 (CK2) and Golgi kinase (G-CK), which both are found in the secretory pathway. This study was undertaken to determine the kinase recognition sequence in a secreted proline-rich salivary protein, PRP1, and thereby identify the responsible kinase. This was done by transfecting a human submandibular cell line, HSG, and a kidney cell line, HEK293, with expression vectors encoding wild-type or mutated PRP1. It was shown that phosphorylation occurred only at the same sites, Ser8 and 22, as in PRP1 purified from saliva. Phosphorylation at either site did not depend on the other site being phosphorylated. The sequence surrounding Ser8 has characteristics of both CK2 and G-CK recognition sequences, but destruction of the CK2 recognition site had no effect on phosphorylation, whereas no phosphorylation occurred if the G-CK recognition sequence was altered. The sequence surrounding Ser22 did not conform to any known kinase recognition sites. If Ser22 was mutated to Thr, no phosphorylation was seen, and a cluster of negatively charged residues at positions 27-29 was identified as part of the enzyme recognition site. Ser22 may be phosphorylated by a G-CK that recognizes an atypical substrate sequence or by a novel kinase. No difference in phosphorylation was seen between undifferentiated and differentiated HSG cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".