RAFT synthesis of poly(<i>N</i>‐isopropylacrylamide) and poly(methacrylic acid) homopolymers and block copolymers: Kinetics and characterization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization was used successfully to synthesize temperature‐responsive poly( N ‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm), poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA), and their temperature‐responsive block copolymers. Detailed RAFT polymerization kinetics of the homopolymers was studied. PNIPAAm and PMAA homopolymerization showed living characteristics that include a linear relationship between M n and conversion, controlled molecular weights, and relatively narrow molecular weight distribution (PDI < 1.3). Furthermore, the homopolymers can be reactivated to produce block copolymers. The RAFT agent, carboxymethyl dithiobenzoate (CMDB), proved to control molecular weight and PDI. As the RAFT agent concentration increases, molecular weight and PDI decreased. However, CMDB showed evidence of having a relatively low chain transfer constant as well as degradation during polymerization. Solution of the block copolymers in phosphate buffered saline displayed temperature reversible characteristics at a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) transition of 31°C. A 5 wt % solution of the block copolymers form thermoreversible gels by a self‐assembly mechanism above the LCST. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 1191–1201, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".