Operators Evaluate Various Stimulation Methods for Multizone Stimulation of Horizontals in Northeast British Columbia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Effective reservoir exploitation in tight-gas wells can be achieved by fracture-stimulating horizontal wells. A primary key to economic success when fracture stimulating horizontal wells is achieving the placement of propped fractures uniformly along the entire lateral section. This well completion strategy is becoming a more common method and is currently being used to effectively develop tight-gas reservoirs in northeast British Columbia, Canada. This paper reviews different well completion and stimulation methods currently being applied in horizontal well stimulation in Northeast British Columbia, Canada. Specifically, the paper reviews horizontal well stimulation of the Montney formation that extends from northwestern Alberta into Northeastern British Columbia. Well construction and well completion strategy should be based on reservoir understanding and optimum stimulation design. This paper discusses a number of options for well construction and stimulation methods, including: packer isolation and frac sleeves, pump down bridge plugs and perforating guns, coiled tubing deployed bridge plugs and tubing conveyed perforating, and hydrajet perforating on CT with sand plug isolation. Evaluation and comparison of these different techniques include well construction, well completion including post-stimulation cleanouts, and post stimulation production analysis, including consideration of logistics, method reliability, and comparison of results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it