Structure and Activities of Constrained Analogues of Human Parathyroid Hormone and Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide: Implications for Receptor-Activating Conformations of the Hormones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) has a helix-bend-helix structure in solution. Part of the C-terminal helix, residues 21-31, is amphiphilic and forms a critical receptor-binding region. Stabilization of this alpha-helix by lactam formation between residues spaced i, i + 4 on the polar face was previously reported to increase adenylyl cyclase-stimulating (AC) activity if between residues 22 and 26 but to diminish it if between residues 26 and 30 [Barbier et al. (1997) J. Med. Chem. 40, 1373-1380]. This work reports the effects of other cyclizations on the polar face, differing in ring size or position, on alpha-helix conformation, as measured by circular dichroism, and on AC-stimulating activity. All analogues cyclized between residues 22 and 26 had at least a 1. 5-fold increase in activity, suggesting an alpha-helical structure between about residues 21 and 26. Cyclization between residues 25 and 29 or residues 26 and 30 diminished activity by 20-30%, despite stabilizing alpha-helix, suggesting that residues 25-31 bind to the receptor in a helical, but not classical alpha-helical, conformation. Analogues cyclized between residues 13 and 17 had slightly increased activity. A bicyclic analogue, with lactams between residues 13 and 17 and residues 22 and 26, had about the same activity as that cyclized only between 22 and 26. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) may bind in a manner similar to the common receptor, but hydrophobic moment calculations suggest that it must bind as a tighter helix in order to optimally present its hydrophobic residues to the receptor. Both PTHrP analogues cyclized between either residues 22 and 26 or residues 26 and 30 had more stable alpha-helices but reduced AC activities, consistent with this hypothesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".