Inelastic seismic response of concrete shear walls considering<i>P</i>delta effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inelastic response of a typical 12-storey ductile reinforced concrete flexural wall is examined under strong earthquake ground motions to determine the importance of Pdelta effects and assess the seismic demand in shear and flexure. According to the stability factor approach of the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) to account for Pdelta effects, the flexural strength of the wall has to be increased by as much as 29%. However, the inelastic dynamic analyses indicate that Pdelta effects on lateral deformations and curvature ductility demand are negligible for walls that meet the 2% NBCC interstorey drift requirement. The current NBCC stability factor approach to consider Pdelta effects is thus overly conservative for shear wall structures, which respond significantly in their second and higher modes of vibration. The analyses also indicate that the magnitude and distribution of shear forces and bending moments in the wall are different from those obtained using the NBCC static design procedure. Plastic hinges can occur above the base of the wall, although the probable moment resistance diagram exceeds the assumed moment envelope after plastic hinge formation at the base. Dynamic amplification of shear forces due to higher mode effects was also observed, which must be accounted for in design. Dynamic shear amplification factors proposed for wall structures in the commentary to the current standard for design of concrete structures in Canada compared well with the results of this study.Key words: seismic, flexural wall, Pdelta effects, stability coefficient, inelastic response, National Building Code of Canada, dynamic shear force amplification, higher mode effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".