Neurons of the ascidian larval nervous system in <i>Ciona intestinalis</i>: II. Peripheral nervous system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The peripheral nervous system of the ascidian tadpole larva comprises a distributed population of isolated receptor neurons, most of unproved function, organized along the trunk or tail epithelium. Previous reports using immunocytochemical methods failed to resolve the detailed morphology of the neurons and their axon pathways. Precleavage embryos of Ciona intestinalis transfected with the promoter of the neuron-specific synaptotagmin gene fused to a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene yielded clearly labelled GFP profiles. These we examined in confocal image stacks of 31 larvae. Anchor cells, at least eight in each adhesive apical papilla, contribute axons to the papillar nerves that terminate in the sensory vesicle of the central nervous system. Two nerve bundles projected from each papilla, suggesting that at least two subpopulations of papillar neurons exist. Each bundle fasciculated with axons of the rostral trunk epidermal neurons (RTEN) in a stereotyped pattern. The RTEN had a hitherto unreported elaborate arbor of sensory dendrites within the tunic, suggesting that each has an extended sensorial field. Two subpopulations of apical trunk epidermal neurons (ATEN), anterior and posterior, were distinguished. As with the RTEN, these neurons extended dendritic arbors into the tunic. Two additional types of tail neuron, the caudal epidermal neurons (dorsal and ventral) as well as a novel bipolar interneuron, were identified. These identified neuron types are the substrate for the ascidian larva's entire peripheral sensory input, important during larval swimming and settlement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".