MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055883627 · doi:10.1002/mop.27658

V‐band millimeter‐wave microstrip to rectangular waveguide transition

2013· article· en· W2055883627 on OpenAlexaff
D. Hammou, Mourad Nedil, Nahi Kandil, E. Moldovan, Serioja Ovidiu Tatu

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du QuébecUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsReturn lossMicrostripExtremely high frequencyHFSSMicrowaveWaveguideMillimeterFrequency bandMaterials scienceInsertion lossPermittivityRelative permittivityFabricationOptoelectronicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringOpticsTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)PhysicsMicrostrip antennaDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article proposes a novel millimeter‐wave microstrip (MSL) to WR 12 standard rectangular waveguide transitions. These dissimilar structures are interconnected via a substrate integrated waveguide (SIW). The MSL and the SIW are integrated on the same ceramic substrate of 9.9 relative permittivity and 125 μm thickness. The MSL was first transformed into an air‐filled rectangular waveguide, and then a stepped impedance or horn transformer was used to match the WR12 standard rectangular waveguide. The central frequency of operation is 61 GHz as required in V‐band wireless communications applications. Commercial Finite Element Method Software and High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) was used to perform the design and the optimization. The S parameter measurements of the back‐to‐back connected transitions show an insertion loss less than 1.5 dB and a return loss better than −10 dB over a 4 GHz band from 60 to 64 GHz. The high performance, the compact size, and the simple fabrication, enable similar transitions to be employed in a number of other millimeter‐wave applications. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55:1696–1700, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.27658

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207