Hyperinflation-induced cardiorespiratory failure in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously showed that severe inspiratory resistive loads cause acute (<1 h) cardiorespiratory failure characterized by arterial hypotension, multifocal myocardial infarcts, and diaphragmatic fatigue. The mechanisms responsible for cardiovascular failure are unknown, but one factor may be the increased ventricular afterload caused by the large negative intrathoracic pressures generated when breathing against an inspiratory load. Because expiratory threshold loads increase intrathoracic pressure and decrease left ventricular afterload, we hypothesized that anesthetized rats forced to breathe against such a load would experience only diaphragmatic failure. Loading approximately doubled end-expiratory lung volume, halved respiratory frequency, and caused arterial hypoxemia and hypercapnia, respiratory acidosis, and increased inspiratory drive. Although hyperinflation immediately reduced the diaphragm's mechanical advantage, fatigue did not occur until near load termination. Mean arterial pressure progressively fell, becoming significant (cardiovascular failure) midway through loading despite tachycardia. Loading was terminated (endurance 125 +/- 43 min; range 82-206 min) when mean arterial pressure dropped below 50 mmHg. Blood samples taken immediately after load termination revealed hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia, and cardiac troponin T, the last indicating myocardial injury that was, according to histology, mainly in the right ventricle. This damage probably reflects a combination of decreased O(2) delivery (decreased venous return and arterial hypoxemia) and greater afterload due to hyperinflation-induced increase in pulmonary vascular resistance. Thus, in rats breathing at an increased end-expiratory lung volume, cardiorespiratory, not just respiratory, failure still occurred. Right heart injury and dysfunction may contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with acute exacerbations of obstructive airway disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".