Quality of Life in Adults Diagnosed With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and Desmoid Tumor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the health-related quality of life in a sample of Canadian adults diagnosed with familial adenomatous polyposis and desmoid tumor. METHODS: The study was conducted in two parts. Seven individuals participated in a focus group prior to a mail-out survey. A cross-sectional mail-out survey was administered to eligible individuals who were actively followed at the Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry at Mount Sinai Hospital. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals (25 female and 16 male) were available to be contacted by the registry coordinator and 23 questionnaire packages were completed, resulting in a 56.1 percent participation rate. The results of this study demonstrated a reduced health-related quality of life for individuals living with familial adenomatous polyposis and desmoid tumor for over 10 years. The main predictors of health-related quality of life in this analysis included marital status (married vs. not married), prior knowledge of desmoid tumor in the family, and current level of hopelessness (R(2) = 0.856, df = 13, F = 26.8, P < 0.001). The qualitative content analysis of themes from the focus group indicated that ongoing medical uncertainty and lack of information from health care professionals, isolation, and family communication were the main challenges in living with desmoid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study suggest that ongoing education of health care professionals is warranted and that information and support interventions may be beneficial to this clinical population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".