MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract LB-215: Inhibition of Polo-like kinase 4 as an anti-cancer strategy

2011· article· en· W2056048124 on OpenAlexaff
Jacqueline M. Mason, Sam Wei, Xunyi Luo, Vincent Nadeem, Reza Kiarash, Ping Huang, Don Awrey, Genie Leung, I. P. Beletskaya, Miklós Fehér, Bryan Forrest, Radek S. Laufer, Peter B. Sampson, Sze-Wan Li, Yong Liu, Yunhui Lang, Henry W. Pauls, Tak W. Mak, James Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolo-like kinaseMitosisCentrosomeKinaseCell biologyBiologyCancer researchCancer cellCancerCell cycleGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polo-like kinase 4 or PLK4 is a member of a conserved family of serine/threonine protein kinases that regulate multiple cellular processes, such as cell division and checkpoint regulation of mitosis. These kinases are often deregulated in cancer. PLK4 is the most structurally divergent PLK, localizes to centrosomes and is a critical regulator of centriole duplication. Over-expression of PLK4 leads to centrosome amplification and results in chromosome instability (CIN), a common characteristic observed in many types of cancers. We found that PLK4 is upregulated in breast cancer, specifically in the basal-like subtype. PLK4 expression is induced by hypoxia and suppressed by p53 in cancer cells. Consistent with this observation, PLK4 expression in cancer cells is upregulated when they are implanted and grown as xenografts in vivo. Furthermore, RNAi-mediated depletion of PLK4 inhibits the growth of cancer cells, but not normal cells (HMEC), in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo. Interestingly, siRNA knockdown of PLK4 sensitizes cancer cells to hypoxia. These findings suggest that targeting PLK4 may be a good therapeutic strategy in treating certain cancers. To this end, we initiated a discovery program that resulted in the identification of potent PLK4 inhibitors. These novel inhibitors are potent anti-prolifeartives, cause loss of mitotic checkpoint followed by apoptotic cell death, and suppress tumor growth in xenograft models. Mechanistically, inhibition of PLK4 suppresses phosphorylation of PLK4 and Histone H3, leads to failure of centrosome clustering and formation of multipolar spindles. Interestingly, breast cancer cell response to PLK4 inhibition appears to differ among subtypes of breast cancer cells and to be influenced by receptor and mutation status, such as ER and PTEN. Since multipolar division in cancer cells is not viable, due to massive missegregation of chromosomes, inhibition of PLK4 and formation of multipolar division followed by cell death may be a unique strategy for killing cancer cells. Implications of these findings in treating cancer will also be discussed. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-215. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-LB-215

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207