Hydrosilylation of Impact Polypropylene Co-polymer in a Twin-screw Extruder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The production of hydrosilylated impact polypropylene (PP) copolymer has been demonstrated in a co-rotating twin-screw extruder. This has been accomplished through a two-step reactive extrusion process that involves: (i) the formation of terminal double bonds on a commodity PP copolymer through peroxide initiated degradation reactions, and (ii) the melt-phase functionalization of these double bonds with hydride-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Spectroscopic analysis of the peroxide degraded PP and the purified hydrosilylated PP has been performed to confirm the attachment of PDMS onto the PP chains. In addition, the hydrosilylated PP has been characterized in terms of molecular, rheological, surface, and mechanical properties. It has been found that the two-step hydrosilylation reaction decreases molecular weight, imparts formation of branching/chain extension, decreases impact strength, and improves surface hydrophobicity. Finally, oscillatory shear measurements exhibit an unusual up-turn in the viscosity curve at low frequencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".