Colloidal Complexes from Poly(vinyl amine) and Carboxymethyl Cellulose Mixtures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phase behaviors of polyelectrolyte complexes formed from dilute solutions of poly(vinyl amine) (PVAm) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) were determined as a function of overall composition and pH. The phase diagram included regions with soluble complexes, colloidal complexes, and macroscopic precipitates. Colloidal complexes were stable when either polymer was in sufficient excess to give electrosteric stabilization. The polymer mixing ratios giving complexes with an isoelectric point of 7 could be predicted from a simple model using the degree of ionization vs pH data for PVAm and CMC. The model failed at extreme pH values because not all added polymer was incorporated into the complexes. At pH 7, essentially all the added polymer was incorporated into the colloidal complex or precipitate, as long as the mixing ratio was within +/-10% of charge stoichiometry. The interaction of PVAm and CMC at pH 7 was endothermic, supporting the generally accepted viewpoint that the interaction of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes is entropy-driven. Although the colloidal complexes had a broad particle size distribution, the average particle size was rather insensitive to mixing ratio. By contrast, complex size was sensitive to electrolyte concentration with no complex formation when the NaCl concentration was > or =2 M.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it