MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056185714 · doi:10.2298/aoo1002023m

Radioimmunotherapy: A novel treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma

2010· article· en· W2056185714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jasna Mihailović, Tomislav Petrović

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive of oncology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadioimmunotherapyIbritumomab tiuxetanMedicineRituximabNuclear medicineCD20LymphomaTherapeutic indexFollicular lymphomaRegimenAntibodyInternal medicineImmunologyPharmacologyMonoclonal antibodyDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and 131I-tositumomab (Bexxar) are current choices for radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of patients with follicular rituximab-relapsed or refractory CD20+ follicular B-cell NHL. Bexxar is available in the United States and Canada, while Zevalin was approved for use only in Europe. The Zevalin regimen consists of rituximab ('cold', chimeric antibody) and 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan ('hot' antibody). In Bexxar regimen, a tositumomab (murine antibody) is used as both, the unlabelled and labelled antibody. In both cases, the therapeutic infusion of 'hot' or radiolabelled component is preceded one week earlier by an infusion of a 'cold' or unlabelled antibody. In the US, the whole-body scanning using 111In-ibritumomab following the initial rituximab infusion is required for determination of biodistribution before the therapeutic dose of Zevalin. Bexxar regimen includes three whole body scans during the week after an imaging dose of 131I-tositumomab, which are necessary for calculation of the therapeutic dose of 131I-tositumomab. For each regimen, patients with a platelet count ?150x109/L receive a full therapeutic dose, whereas patients with platelet counts >100x109/L<150x109/L receive a modified dose of radiolabelled antibody. Therapeutic dose of Zevalin is 11-15 MBq/kg (up to maximum of 1200 MBq), while the dose of Bexxar is 1.85-5.55 GBq (maximal tolerated absorbed dose for the whole body is 75cGy). If compared to alternative treatments, the radioimmunotherapy with Bexxar and Zevalin achieves longer time to progression and longer duration of response with overall response rate between 80% to almost 100%. Repeated treatment with Zevalin or Bexxar is possible. The additional subsequent conventional therapy is compatible. Radioimmunotherapy is radiation safe and well tolerated treatment with primarily transient haematological adverse events. Pregnancy and lactation are contraindications for radioimmunotherapy. Beta radiation of 90Y allows treatment on outpatient basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchive of oncologySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207