Direct Synthesis of Zirconia Aerogel Nanoarchitecture in Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to synthesize porous ZrO2 aerogels with a nanostructure via a direct sol-gel route in the green solvent supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2). The synthesis involved the coordination and polycondensation of a zirconium alkoxide using acetic acid in CO2, followed by scCO2 drying and calcination. Either a translucent or opaque monolith was obtained, which was subsequently characterized by electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis, N2 physisorption, and infrared spectroscopy analysis. The electron microscopy results showed that the translucent monolithic ZrO2 exhibited a well-defined mesoporous structure, while the opaque monolith, formed using added alcohol as a cosolvent, was composed of loosely compacted nanospherical particles with a diameter of ca. 20 nm. After calcination at 400 and 500 degrees C, X-ray diffraction results indicated that the ZrO2 exhibited tetragonal and/or monoclinic phases. In situ infrared spectroscopy results showed the formation of a Zr-acetate coordinate complex at the initial stage of the polycondensation, followed by further condensation of the complex into macromolecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".