MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056266218 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00314.2003

Flow-mediated dilation in human brachial artery after different circulatory occlusion conditions

2004· article· en· W2056266218 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReactive hyperemiaForearmBrachial arteryOcclusionMedicineBlood flowCuffWristCardiologyInternal medicineConstrictionAnatomySurgeryBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Different magnitudes and durations of postocclusion reactive hyperemia were achieved by occluding different volumes of tissue with and without ischemic exercise to test the hypotheses that flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery would depend on the increase in peak flow rate or shear stress and that the position of the occlusion cuff would affect the response. The brachial artery FMD response was observed by high-frequency ultrasound imaging with curve fitting to minimize the effects of random measurement error in eight healthy, young, nonsmoking men. Reactive hyperemia was graded by 5-min occlusion distal to the measurement site at the wrist and the forearm and proximal to the site in the upper arm. Flow was further increased by exercise during occlusion at the wrist and forearm positions. For the two wrist occlusion conditions, flow increased eightfold and FMD was only 1 to 2% (P > 0.05). After the forearm and upper arm occlusions, blood flow was almost identical but FMD after forearm occlusions was 3.4% (P < 0.05), whereas it was significantly greater (6.6%, P < 0.05) and more prolonged after proximal occlusion. Forearm occlusion plus exercise caused a greater and more prolonged increase in blood flow, yet FMD (7.0%) was qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that after proximal occlusion. Overall, the magnitude of FMD was significantly correlated with peak forearm blood flow (r = 0.59, P < 0.001), peak shear rate (r = 0.49, P < 0.002), and total 5-min reactive hyperemia (r = 0.52, P < 0.001). The prolonged FMD after upper arm occlusion suggests that the mechanism for FMD differs with occlusion cuff position.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it