Complementary expression patterns of six nonessential Caenorhabditis elegans core 2/I N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase homologues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Caenorhabditis elegans genome contains 18 sequences related to mammalian core 2/I N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases. The six most closely related genes (gly-1 and gly-15 to gly-19) likely encode active enzymes, because are all transcribed and do not appear to be pseudogenes. Polypeptide divergence and the gene structures are both concordant with a common ancestor at the time of radiation from mammals that underwent three rounds of duplication and, most recently, a tandem duplication. Polypeptide alignments with mammalian homologues do not indicate whether the enzyme specificities are core 2, 4, or I-like or novel, but do clearly demonstrate the secondary structure characteristics of glycosyltransferases. The six homologues have essentially nonoverlapping expression patterns, unrelated by tissue type or cell lineage. The extent varies widely; gly-15 is expressed only in two gland cells, whereas gly-18 is broadly expressed in diverse cell types. gly-1, -15, -18 and -19 are expressed during adulthood; gly-16 and gly-17 appear to be restricted to embryonic or early larval stages. The parsimonious interpretation of the expression pattern and sequence data is that the catalytic activities are similar but with diverged promoters. Null alleles of three of the genes were generated without causing gross abnormality in homozygous animals. RNA-mediated interference experiments also failed to induce defects in the four genes tested. Nevertheless, the nematode has evolved six diverged core 2 GlcNAc-T-like genes, and we postulate that these arose in response to selection pressures to which C. elegans is not ordinarily subjected in the laboratory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".