Magnesium and Phosphate Ions Enable NAD Binding to Methylenetetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase-Methenyltetrahydrofolate Cyclohydrolase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mitochondrial NAD-dependent methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase-cyclohydrolase (NMDMC) is believed to have evolved from a trifunctional NADP-dependent methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase-cyclohydrolase-synthetase. It is unique in its absolute requirement for inorganic phosphate and magnesium ions to support dehydrogenase activity. To enable us to investigate the roles of these ions, a homology model of human NMDMC was constructed based on the structures of three homologous proteins. The model supports the hypothesis that the absolutely required Pi can bind in close proximity to the 2'-hydroxyl of NAD through interactions with Arg166 and Arg198. The characterization of mutants of Arg166, Asp190, and Arg198 show that Arg166 is primarily responsible for Pi binding, while Arg198 plays a secondary role, assisting in binding and properly orienting the ion in the cofactor binding site. Asp190 helps to properly position Arg166. Mutants of Asp133 suggest that the magnesium ion interacts with both Pi and the aspartate side chain and plays a role in positioning Pi and NAD. NMDMC uses Pi and magnesium to adapt an NADP binding site for NAD binding. This adaptation represents a novel variation of the classic Rossmann fold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".