Spectroscopic understanding of ultra-high rate performance for LiMn0.75Fe0.25PO4 nanorods–graphene hybrid in lithium ion battery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comprehensive X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy at the C, O and Li K-edges and the Mn, Fe, and P L-edges of LiMn(0.75)Fe(0.25)PO(4) nanorods-graphene has been reported in great detail. Compared to that of free standing graphene and LiMn(0.75)Fe(0.25)PO(4), the intimate interaction between the nanorods and graphene via charge redistribution has been unambiguously confirmed. This interaction not only anchors the nanorods onto the graphene but also modifies its surface chemistry, both of which afford the nanorods-graphene hybrid an ultra-high rate performance in lithium ion batteries. Such knowledge is important for the understanding of hybrid nanomaterials for lithium ion batteries and allows rational design for further improvements in performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".